Media reports recently suggested that Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, during a December 3 plenary session of Japan’s House of Councillors, affirmed that Japan “understands and respects” China’s position that Taiwan is an inalienable part of the People’s Republic of China. However, China’s Foreign Ministry has rejected these reports, calling them inaccurate and misleading.

According to Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian, Prime Minister Takaichi did not reiterate such an understanding. Instead, Lin clarified that Takaichi merely stated that “the Japanese government’s basic position regarding Taiwan remains as stated in the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement, and there has been no change to this position,” without providing any further elaboration.

Lin Jian stressed that China’s stance on the matter remains firm and unequivocal. He urged Japan to “reflect on and correct its wrongdoing” and demanded that Tokyo retract what Beijing views as Prime Minister Takaichi’s erroneous remarks. Lin referred to the issue as one of principle, emphasizing that the historical facts and Japan’s commitments are clearly documented.

The spokesperson noted that China has repeatedly posed the same questions to Japan over several days but has yet to receive any substantive response. According to Lin, criticism of Takaichi’s comments has emerged both within Japan and internationally.

Lin further argued that Japan’s statement of “no change to the position” is insufficient and unacceptable from China’s perspective. He questioned why the Japanese side is unwilling to clearly articulate the commitments it made in the 1972 Joint Statement, which forms the political foundation of China-Japan relations.

“If the Japanese side’s fundamental position on Taiwan is indeed as stated in the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement, can Prime Minister Takaichi accurately and fully articulate that position?” Lin asked. He pressed Japan to clarify its logic, motives, and intentions, stating that Tokyo owes both China and the international community a clear explanation.

The exchange adds a new layer of tension to China-Japan relations at a time when regional geopolitics surrounding Taiwan remain highly sensitive.

Disclaimer

This article is based on official statements, media reports, and publicly available information. The content aims to provide accurate geopolitical analysis for informational purposes only. Readers are advised to refer to original government releases or verified sources for further details.