In a recent interview, US Trade Representative Ambassador Jameson Greer defended the administration’s trade and tariff policies following a Supreme Court ruling that could significantly impact America’s fiscal position and trade strategy with China.

The discussion began with concerns raised by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, which warned that the Supreme Court’s decision on AIPA tariffs could add nearly $2.4 trillion to the national debt. According to analysts, the ruling has made the already fragile fiscal outlook even worse. Critics have questioned whether the administration’s aggressive tariff strategy was worth the financial risk.

Responding to these concerns, Greer rejected the criticism, stating that the administration inherited an economic emergency. He argued that the US trade deficit had increased by nearly 40 percent under former President Joe Biden, creating an urgent need for action. According to Greer, the government moved quickly to protect domestic industries and bring global trade partners to the negotiating table.

He emphasized that emergency trade measures were necessary to counter unfair practices and restore balance. Even after the court’s decision, he said the administration still has access to strong and legally sound authorities that will allow it to continue rebuilding its trade program.

Concerns have also emerged regarding the ruling’s impact on US leverage in trade negotiations with China. Analysts monitoring China’s economic policies reportedly welcomed the decision, believing it weakens Washington’s bargaining power. Reuters noted that US soybean exporters may struggle to compete with Brazil, where record harvests have made soybeans cheaper. Meanwhile, the South China Morning Post reported that the ruling removes an important pressure tool previously used by the White House against Beijing.

When asked whether this decision weakens America’s position ahead of upcoming talks with Chinese leadership, Greer acknowledged disappointment with the ruling but maintained confidence in diplomatic relations. He said President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping have built a stable and strong relationship over time.

Greer also highlighted that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and other officials have established working ties with Chinese counterparts. He stressed that existing trade agreements were not dependent on the court’s ruling and pointed out that average tariffs on Chinese imports remain close to 40 percent, even now.

According to Greer, the administration’s objective is not to escalate conflict with China, but to create long-term stability. This stability is crucial for American farmers, especially soybean producers, as well as companies selling aircraft, medical devices, and other products to China. He confirmed that the planned meeting between the two presidents in late March or early April remains on schedule and is expected to be productive.

Outlining the goals of the upcoming meeting, Greer said the primary focus will be ensuring that China fulfills its commitments under existing trade agreements. This includes continued purchases of American goods and the supply of rare earth materials.

He added that the meeting will also help define the future direction of US-China relations over the next six months to one year. Greer revealed that President Xi is expected to visit the United States in the fall, further strengthening diplomatic engagement.

Another major issue discussed during the interview was the question of refunds related to the overturned tariffs. The Supreme Court did not provide clear guidance on how refunds should be handled, leading to political reactions from Democratic leaders.

California Governor Gavin Newsom suggested that Americans should receive direct compensation for the financial burden caused by the tariffs. Illinois Governor JB Pritzker went further by issuing a formal “invoice” demanding $1,700 per family in Illinois, totaling more than $8 billion.

Greer dismissed these proposals, arguing that they showed a lack of understanding of international trade. He explained that tariff refunds typically go to importing companies, many of which are foreign-owned firms operating in the US. As a result, individual consumers are unlikely to receive direct payments.

He also noted that many of the states now demanding refunds had previously challenged the tariffs in court. According to Greer, if lawmakers want a different refund system, they must pursue changes through Congress.

On the legal side, Greer clarified that the refund process is now in the hands of the judiciary. The Supreme Court declined to provide instructions, leaving the matter to lower courts such as the Court of International Trade. He said the administration will comply with whatever process the courts establish.

The interview concluded with Greer reaffirming the administration’s commitment to enforcing trade agreements, protecting American industries, and maintaining economic stability. Despite legal setbacks, he expressed confidence that the government has sufficient tools to pursue its trade objectives and preserve US competitiveness on the global stage.

The conversation aired on Fox News’ daytime program Outnumbered, highlighting ongoing debates over tariffs, trade policy, and US-China relations at a critical time for the global economy.

Disclaimer

This article is based on publicly available interviews, reports, and media discussions. The information provided is for general awareness only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult professionals before making any decisions.